You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Iron and zinc content of selected foods in the diet of schoolchildren in Kumi district, east of Uganda: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-10-81 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ida Tidemann-Andersen, Hedwig Acham, Amund Maage, Marian K Malde |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Mali | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 18% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2017.
All research outputs
#19,066,047
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,291
of 1,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,523
of 122,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#17
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.