Peer 4
Peer 2 seems not to be qualified to take part in a proper scientific discussion as all explanations which do not fit into his/her view are simply being ignored...
Peer 2 seems not to be qualified to take part in a proper scientific discussion as all explanations which do not fit into his/her view are simply being ignored...
I completely agree with Peer 2's arguement. He is correct about the different loading control, the authors claim same positive control used for the 45 days series and 60 days series yet the "Loading" …
Further discussion is warranted. This paper contains data which do not fit physics.
No further discussion is warranted.