↓ Skip to main content

Food groups and risk of chronic disease: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of cohort studies

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Food groups and risk of chronic disease: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of cohort studies
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13643-016-0302-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lukas Schwingshackl, Anna Chaimani, Angela Bechthold, Khalid Iqbal, Marta Stelmach-Mardas, Georg Hoffmann, Carolina Schwedhelm, Sabrina Schlesinger, Heiner Boeing

Abstract

There is a lack of systematic and comprehensive evaluations whether food intakes lower or increase risk of chronic diseases. In this network meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies, we aim to evaluate the effects of different foods on risk of chronic diseases. We will search PubMed and EMBASE. This will be supplemented by a hand search and author contacts. Citations, abstracts, and relevant papers will be screened for eligibility by two reviewers independently. Prospective cohort studies will be included if they meet the following criteria: (1) evaluate the association of single food or food groups with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular diseases (incidence and mortality), cancer (incidence and mortality) or risk of type 2 diabetes. The following food groups will be evaluated: whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy products, fish, red meat, processed meat and sugar-sweetened beverages; (2) include participants ≥18 years of age; and (3) study population were free of outcome(s) of interest at the onset of the study. To assess study quality, we will extract the following characteristics: study size, duration of follow-up, dietary assessment method, assessment of outcome and adjustment factors. If the identified studies appear sufficiently similar within and across the different comparisons between pairs of food groups, we will estimate summary-relative effects using random effects network meta-analysis. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses will be performed stratified by different follow-up cut-points, geographical region and sex. This is a presentation of the study protocol only. Results and conclusions are pending completion of this study. Our systematic review will be of great value to national and international authorities for evidence-based nutritional recommendation/guidelines, regarding the implementation of food-based dietary guidelines for prevention of chronic diseases. Moreover, our results can be implemented to develop new diet quality indices/scores. PROSPERO CRD42016037069.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Professor 8 6%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 26 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 38 30%