You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of carbohydrate combined with caffeine on repeated sprint cycling and agility performance in female athletes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-11-17 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chia-Lun Lee, Ching-Feng Cheng, Todd A Astorino, Chia-Jung Lee, Hsin-Wei Huang, Wen-Dien Chang |
Abstract |
Caffeine (CAF) has been shown to improve performance during early phase of repeated sprint exercise; however some studies show that CAF also increases the magnitude of physical stress represented by augmented blood lactate, glucose, and cortisol concentrations during latter phase of repeated sprint exercise. No studies have investigated the efficacy of combined carbohydrate (CHO) and CAF consumption during repeated sprint exercise (RSE) in female athletes. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of CAF with CHO supplementation on RSE and agility. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
United States | 3 | 11% |
Spain | 2 | 7% |
Australia | 2 | 7% |
Argentina | 1 | 4% |
Kenya | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 61% |
Scientists | 9 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 164 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 37 | 22% |
Student > Master | 30 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
Researcher | 12 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
Other | 27 | 16% |
Unknown | 40 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 63 | 38% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 42 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,406,030
of 25,381,384 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#325
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,879
of 438,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#304
of 850 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 850 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.