You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, September 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yong Zhang, Tao Liu, Clifford A Meyer, Jérôme Eeckhoute, David S Johnson, Bradley E Bernstein, Chad Nusbaum, Richard M Myers, Myles Brown, Wei Li, X Shirley Liu |
Abstract |
We present Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq data, MACS, which analyzes data generated by short read sequencers such as Solexa's Genome Analyzer. MACS empirically models the shift size of ChIP-Seq tags, and uses it to improve the spatial resolution of predicted binding sites. MACS also uses a dynamic Poisson distribution to effectively capture local biases in the genome, allowing for more robust predictions. MACS compares favorably to existing ChIP-Seq peak-finding algorithms, and is freely available. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5,850 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 107 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 36 | <1% |
Germany | 24 | <1% |
France | 13 | <1% |
Italy | 12 | <1% |
Spain | 9 | <1% |
China | 9 | <1% |
Netherlands | 8 | <1% |
Brazil | 8 | <1% |
Other | 60 | 1% |
Unknown | 5564 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1698 | 29% |
Researcher | 1138 | 19% |
Student > Master | 579 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 469 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 301 | 5% |
Other | 727 | 12% |
Unknown | 938 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2036 | 35% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1798 | 31% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 241 | 4% |
Computer Science | 197 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 118 | 2% |
Other | 408 | 7% |
Unknown | 1052 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#659,039
of 24,619,469 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#438
of 4,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,283
of 93,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,619,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them