Title |
Blood pressure-lowering effect of Shinrin-yoku (Forest bathing): a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12906-017-1912-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuki Ideno, Kunihiko Hayashi, Yukina Abe, Kayo Ueda, Hiroyasu Iso, Mitsuhiko Noda, Jung-Su Lee, Shosuke Suzuki |
Abstract |
Shinrin-yoku (experiencing the forest atmosphere or forest bathing) has received increasing attention from the perspective of preventive medicine in recent years. Some studies have reported that the forest environment decreases blood pressure. However, little is known about the possibility of anti-hypertensive applications of Shinrin-yoku. This study aimed to evaluate preventive or therapeutic effects of the forest environment on blood pressure. We systematically reviewed the medical literature and performed a meta-analysis.Four electronic databases were systematically searched for the period before May 2016 with language restriction of English and Japanese. The review considered all published, randomized, controlled trials, cohort studies, and comparative studies that evaluated the effects of the forest environment on changes in systolic blood pressure. A subsequent meta-analysis was performed. Twenty trials involving 732 participants were reviewed. Systolic blood pressure of the forest environment was significantly lower than that of the non-forest environment. Additionally, diastolic blood pressure of the forest environment was significantly lower than that of the non-forest environment. This systematic review shows a significant effect of Shinrin-yoku on reduction of blood pressure. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
United States | 3 | 6% |
Japan | 3 | 6% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Finland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 31 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 37 | 77% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 10% |
Scientists | 5 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 357 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 53 | 15% |
Student > Master | 46 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 11% |
Researcher | 34 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
Other | 71 | 20% |
Unknown | 95 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 10% |
Psychology | 27 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 23 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 22 | 6% |
Other | 84 | 24% |
Unknown | 115 | 32% |