↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacological inhibition of MALT1 protease activity protects mice in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pharmacological inhibition of MALT1 protease activity protects mice in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-11-124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Conor Mc Guire, Lynn Elton, Peter Wieghofer, Jens Staal, Sofie Voet, Annelies Demeyer, Daniel Nagel, Daniel Krappmann, Marco Prinz, Rudi Beyaert, Geert van Loo

Abstract

The paracaspase mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation protein 1 (MALT1) is crucial for lymphocyte activation through signaling to the transcription factor NF-κB. Besides functioning as a scaffold signaling protein, MALT1 also acts as a cysteine protease that specifically cleaves a number of substrates and contributes to specific T cell receptor-induced gene expression. Recently, small molecule inhibitors of MALT1 proteolytic activity were identified and shown to have promising anticancer properties in subtypes of B cell lymphoma. However, information on the therapeutic potential of small compound inhibitors that target MALT1 protease activity in autoimmunity is still lacking.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 31%
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Chemistry 4 7%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,755,486
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#750
of 2,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,669
of 240,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#6
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.