You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-intensity compared to moderate-intensity training for exercise initiation, enjoyment, adherence, and intentions: an intervention study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-789 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katie M Heinrich, Pratik M Patel, Joshua L O’Neal, Bryan S Heinrich |
| Abstract |
Understanding exercise participation for overweight and obese adults is critical for preventing comorbid conditions. Group-based high-intensity functional training (HIFT) provides time-efficient aerobic and resistance exercise at self-selected intensity levels which can increase adherence; behavioral responses to HIFT are unknown. This study examined effects of HIFT as compared to moderate-intensity aerobic and resistance training (ART) on exercise initiation, enjoyment, adherence, and intentions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 14% |
| United States | 7 | 12% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 22% |
| Scientists | 9 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 603 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 598 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 112 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 109 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 9% |
| Researcher | 50 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 5% |
| Other | 97 | 16% |
| Unknown | 151 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 193 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 10% |
| Psychology | 27 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 4% |
| Other | 60 | 10% |
| Unknown | 169 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2020.
All research outputs
#645,401
of 25,381,384 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#636
of 17,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,966
of 237,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#15
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.