↓ Skip to main content

De-novo assembly of mango fruit peel transcriptome reveals mechanisms of mango response to hot water treatment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De-novo assembly of mango fruit peel transcriptome reveals mechanisms of mango response to hot water treatment
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-957
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neta Luria, Noa Sela, Mor Yaari, Oleg Feygenberg, Ilana Kobiler, Amnon Lers, Dov Prusky

Abstract

The mango belongs to the genus Mangifera, consisting of numerous tropical fruiting trees in the flowering plant family, Anacardiaceae. Postharvest treatment by hot water brushing (HWB) for 15-20 s was introduced commercially to improve fruit quality and reduce postharvest disease. This treatment enabled successful storage for 3-4 weeks at 12°C, with improved color and reduced disease development, but it enhanced lenticel discoloration on the fruit peel. We investigated global gene expression induced in fruit peel by HWB treatment, and identified key genes involved in mechanisms potentially associated with fruit resistance to pathogens, peel color improvement, and development of lenticel discoloration; this might explain the fruit's phenotypic responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 99 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 32 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 13%
Unspecified 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 38 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,447,868
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,593
of 10,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,286
of 262,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#84
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.