You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of protein type and composition on postprandial markers of skeletal muscle anabolism, adipose tissue lipolysis, and hypothalamic gene expression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12970-015-0076-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher Brooks Mobley, Carlton D Fox, Brian S Ferguson, Corrie A Pascoe, James C Healy, Jeremy S McAdam, Christopher M Lockwood, Michael D Roberts |
| Abstract |
We examined the acute effects of different dietary protein sources (0.19 g, dissolved in 1 ml of water) on skeletal muscle, adipose tissue and hypothalamic satiety-related markers in fasted, male Wistar rats (~250 g). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 9 | 23% |
| United States | 8 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 21% |
| Scientists | 6 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Iraq | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,360,339
of 25,487,317 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#316
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,671
of 448,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#294
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,487,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.