↓ Skip to main content

The older people, omega-3, and cognitive health (EPOCH) trial design and methodology: A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial investigating the effect of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids on…

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
270 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The older people, omega-3, and cognitive health (EPOCH) trial design and methodology: A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial investigating the effect of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids on cognitive ageing and wellbeing in cognitively healthy older adults
Published in
Nutrition Journal, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-10-117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Danthiir, Nicholas R Burns, Ted Nettelbeck, Carlene Wilson, Gary Wittert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 264 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 19%
Student > Bachelor 43 16%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 56 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 24%
Psychology 37 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 4%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 69 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2023.
All research outputs
#14,228,756
of 24,294,722 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,033
of 1,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,771
of 142,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#31
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,722 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.