Title |
In a single-blind, matched group design: branched-chain amino acid supplementation and resistance training maintains lean body mass during a caloric restricted diet
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12970-015-0112-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wesley David Dudgeon, Elizabeth Page Kelley, Timothy Paul Scheett |
Abstract |
Athletes and active adults many times have the goal of improving/maintaining fitness while losing weight and this is best achieved by caloric restriction in combination with exercise. However, this poses a risk for lean tissue loss, which can limit performance. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) supplement, in conjunction with heavy resistance training and a carbohydrate caloric-restricted "cut diet" on body composition and muscle fitness. Seventeen resistance-trained males (21-28 years of age) were randomized to a BCAA group (n = 9) or a carbohydrate (CHO) group (n = 8) who both received their respective supplement during the 8 weeks of a prescribed body building style resistance training protocol. Subjects were prescribed a hypocaloric diet (based upon pre-intervention analysis) that was to be followed during the study. The BCAA group lost fat mass (-0.05 ± 0.08 kg;p < .05) and maintained lean mass, while the CHO group lost lean mass (-0.90 ± 0.06 kg; p < .05) and body mass (-2.3 ± 0.7 kg; p < .05). Both groups increased 1RM squat, but the increase in the BCAA group (15.1 ± 2.2 kg; p < .05)was greater (P < 0.05) than the CHO group. The BCAA group increased 1RM bench press (7.1 ± 1.6 kg; P < 0.05), while the CHO group decreased strength (-3.7 ± 2.3 kg; P < 0.05). The only change in muscular endurance was an increase in repetitions to fatigue (5.3 ± 0.2; p < .05) in the CHO group. These results show that BCAA supplementation in trained individuals performing resistance training while on a hypocaloric diet can maintain lean mass and preserve skeletal muscle performance while losing fat mass. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 22 | 17% |
United States | 22 | 17% |
Spain | 9 | 7% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
Mexico | 3 | 2% |
South Africa | 3 | 2% |
Australia | 3 | 2% |
Argentina | 2 | 2% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 58 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 95 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 18% |
Scientists | 10 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 4 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 272 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 78 | 28% |
Student > Master | 66 | 24% |
Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 7% |
Researcher | 18 | 6% |
Other | 48 | 17% |
Unknown | 30 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 81 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 8% |
Unknown | 39 | 14% |