You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pharmacy sales data versus ward stock accounting for the surveillance of broad-spectrum antibiotic use in hospitals
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-166 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jon B Haug, Randi Myhr, Åsmund Reikvam |
Abstract |
Antibiotic consumption in hospitals is commonly measured using the accumulated amount of drugs delivered from the pharmacy to ward held stocks. The reliability of this method, particularly the impact of the length of the registration periods, has not been evaluated and such evaluation was aim of the study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mozambique | 1 | 3% |
Norway | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 28% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 42% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2014.
All research outputs
#3,173,430
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#502
of 2,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,122
of 242,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.