↓ Skip to main content

Using a theory driven approach to develop and evaluate a complex mental health intervention: the friendship bench project in Zimbabwe

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 718)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using a theory driven approach to develop and evaluate a complex mental health intervention: the friendship bench project in Zimbabwe
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13033-016-0050-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dixon Chibanda, Ruth Verhey, Epiphany Munetsi, Frances M. Cowan, Crick Lund

Abstract

There is a paucity of data on how to deliver complex interventions that seek to reduce the treatment gap for mental disorders, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. The need for well-documented protocols which clearly describe the development and the scale-up of programs and interventions is necessary if such interventions are to be replicated elsewhere. This article describes the use of a theory of change (ToC) model to develop a brief psychological intervention for common mental disorders and its' evaluation through a cluster randomized controlled trial in Zimbabwe. A total of eight ToC workshops were held with a range of stakeholders over a 6-month period with a focus on four key components of the program: formative work, piloting, evaluation and scale-up. A ToC map was developed as part of the process with defined causal pathways leading to the desired impact. Interventions, indicators, assumptions and rationale for each point along the causal pathway were considered. Political buy-in from stakeholders together with key resources, which included human, facility/infrastructure, communication and supervision were identified as critical needs using the ToC approach. Ten (10) key interventions with specific indicators, assumptions and rationale formed part of the final ToC map, which graphically illustrated the causal pathway leading to the development of a psychological intervention and the successful implementation of a cluster randomized controlled trial. ToC workshops can enhance stakeholder engagement through an iterative process leading to a shared vision that can improve outcomes of complex mental health interventions particularly where scaling up of the intervention is desired.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Unknown 185 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 20%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 29 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 18%
Social Sciences 27 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 39 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,174,082
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#36
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,265
of 297,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.