↓ Skip to main content

“Dietary fibre”: moving beyond the “soluble/insoluble” classification for monogastric nutrition, with an emphasis on humans and pigs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Dietary fibre”: moving beyond the “soluble/insoluble” classification for monogastric nutrition, with an emphasis on humans and pigs
Published in
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40104-019-0350-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara A. Williams, Deirdre Mikkelsen, Bernadine M. Flanagan, Michael J. Gidley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 181 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 49 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 64 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#12,251,917
of 21,148,463 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#152
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,659
of 287,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,148,463 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them