You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
“Dietary fibre”: moving beyond the “soluble/insoluble” classification for monogastric nutrition, with an emphasis on humans and pigs
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, May 2019
Barbara A. Williams, Deirdre Mikkelsen, Bernadine M. Flanagan, Michael J. Gidley
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||6||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||33||13%|
|Student > Bachelor||31||12%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||30||12%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||14||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||45||17%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||20||8%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||19||7%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||16||6%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||13||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 349,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.