You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of white sweet potato tube-feeding formula in elderly diabetic patients: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition & Metabolism, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12986-019-0398-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chiao-Ming Chen, Chun-Kuang Shih, Yi-Jing Su, Kuan-Un Cheang, Shu-Fang Lo, Sing-Chung Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 96 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 51 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#18,695,869
of 23,170,347 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#779
of 954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,954
of 354,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,170,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.