Comparison of 3 T and 1.5 T for T2* magnetic resonance of tissue iron

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2016

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

So far, Altmetric has seen 16 X posts from 16 X users, with an upper bound of 67,584 followers.

@DrRyanPDaly @AmitRPatelMD @venkmurthy @SCMRorg @ash71us @RogueRad @onco_cardiology We don't use 3T but T2* is more prone to artifacts and errors at 3T from increased B0 inhomogeneity. 1.5T is the gold standard for T2*. Normal T2* at 3T is 33 ± 4 ms based

@DrRyanPDaly @AmitRPatelMD @SCMRorg @ash71us @RogueRad @onco_cardiology We are doing our clinical scans at 1.5T but I am using 3T exclusively for research. This is a nice paper comparing T2* at 1.5 vs. 3T https://t.co/FouBzQtCgk

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 12 additional X posts.