| Title |
Taming the pandemic? The importance of homemade plant-based foods and beverages as community responses to COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13002-020-00426-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Pieroni, Ina Vandebroek, Julia Prakofjewa, Rainer W. Bussmann, Narel Y. Paniagua-Zambrana, Alfred Maroyi, Luisa Torri, Dauro M. Zocchi, Ashley T. K. Dam, Shujaul M. Khan, Habib Ahmad, Yeter Yeşil, Ryan Huish, Manuel Pardo-de-Santayana, Andrei Mocan, Xuebo Hu, Odara Boscolo, Renata Sõukand |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| Italy | 2 | 10% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 242 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 10% |
| Researcher | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 18% |
| Unknown | 96 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 17% |
| Unknown | 107 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,229,649
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#23
of 787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,318
of 528,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them