↓ Skip to main content

The practice of active patient involvement in rare disease research using ICT: experiences and lessons from the RUDY JAPAN project

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The practice of active patient involvement in rare disease research using ICT: experiences and lessons from the RUDY JAPAN project
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, February 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40900-021-00253-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nao Hamakawa, Atsushi Kogetsu, Moeko Isono, Chisato Yamasaki, Shirou Manabe, Toshihiro Takeda, Kazumasa Iwamoto, Tomoya Kubota, Joe Barrett, Nathanael Gray, Alison Turner, Harriet Teare, Yukie Imamura, Beverley Anne Yamamoto, Jane Kaye, Michihiro Hide, Masanori P. Takahashi, Yasushi Matsumura, Muhammad Kassim Javaid, Kazuto Kato

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 12 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 13 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,030,283
of 24,564,172 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#81
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,586
of 516,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,564,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.