You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trends in US home food preparation and consumption: analysis of national nutrition surveys and time use studies from 1965–1966 to 2007–2008
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lindsey P Smith, Shu Wen Ng, Barry M Popkin |
| Abstract |
It has been well-documented that Americans have shifted towards eating out more and cooking at home less. However, little is known about whether these trends have continued into the 21st century, and whether these trends are consistent amongst low-income individuals, who are increasingly the target of public health programs that promote home cooking. The objective of this study is to examine how patterns of home cooking and home food consumption have changed from 1965 to 2008 by socio-demographic groups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 18% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 75% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 487 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 477 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 115 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 12% |
| Researcher | 49 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 76 | 16% |
| Unknown | 94 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 71 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 51 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 115 | 24% |
| Unknown | 131 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 399. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#75,770
of 25,489,496 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#29
of 1,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#440
of 212,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,489,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.