↓ Skip to main content

Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 856)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
382 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
17 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12970-021-00412-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Antonio, Darren G. Candow, Scott C. Forbes, Bruno Gualano, Andrew R. Jagim, Richard B. Kreider, Eric S. Rawson, Abbie E. Smith-Ryan, Trisha A. VanDusseldorp, Darryn S. Willoughby, Tim N. Ziegenfuss

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 382 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 328 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 74 23%
Student > Master 33 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 5%
Other 16 5%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 62 19%
Unknown 111 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 54 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 5%
Unspecified 13 4%
Other 49 15%
Unknown 112 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 375. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#59,071
of 21,295,635 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#29
of 856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,003
of 414,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#3
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,295,635 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.