You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12970-021-00412-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jose Antonio, Darren G. Candow, Scott C. Forbes, Bruno Gualano, Andrew R. Jagim, Richard B. Kreider, Eric S. Rawson, Abbie E. Smith-Ryan, Trisha A. VanDusseldorp, Darryn S. Willoughby, Tim N. Ziegenfuss |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 514 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 122 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 32 | 6% |
| Spain | 26 | 5% |
| Mexico | 23 | 4% |
| Canada | 9 | 2% |
| Brazil | 9 | 2% |
| Japan | 9 | 2% |
| India | 6 | 1% |
| Germany | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 59 | 11% |
| Unknown | 213 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 362 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 83 | 16% |
| Scientists | 64 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 605 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 605 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 95 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 60 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 4% |
| Other | 90 | 15% |
| Unknown | 279 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 82 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 62 | 10% |
| Unknown | 294 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 755. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#24,499
of 24,554,073 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#14
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#810
of 434,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#14
of 850 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,554,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 850 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.