↓ Skip to main content

Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 892)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
474 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
37 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
460 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12970-021-00412-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Antonio, Darren G. Candow, Scott C. Forbes, Bruno Gualano, Andrew R. Jagim, Richard B. Kreider, Eric S. Rawson, Abbie E. Smith-Ryan, Trisha A. VanDusseldorp, Darryn S. Willoughby, Tim N. Ziegenfuss

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 474 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 460 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 460 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 80 17%
Student > Master 50 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 5%
Other 22 5%
Researcher 20 4%
Other 76 17%
Unknown 188 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 71 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 53 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Other 51 11%
Unknown 195 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 611. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#31,524
of 23,402,852 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#20
of 892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,101
of 443,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#20
of 851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,402,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.