↓ Skip to main content

Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 974)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
57 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
581 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
89 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
808 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?
Published in
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12970-021-00412-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Antonio, Darren G. Candow, Scott C. Forbes, Bruno Gualano, Andrew R. Jagim, Richard B. Kreider, Eric S. Rawson, Abbie E. Smith-Ryan, Trisha A. VanDusseldorp, Darryn S. Willoughby, Tim N. Ziegenfuss

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 581 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 808 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 808 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 108 13%
Student > Master 66 8%
Other 38 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 4%
Researcher 27 3%
Other 103 13%
Unknown 433 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 86 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 77 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 2%
Other 74 9%
Unknown 450 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 910. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2024.
All research outputs
#20,396
of 26,628,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#10
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#710
of 456,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#10
of 852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,628,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.